The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis
The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis Fatma Demet İnce , a, ⁎ Hamit Yaşar Ellidağ , b Mehmet Koseoğlu , b Neşe Şimşek , a Hülya Yalçın , a and Mustafa Osman Zengin a Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Go to: Abstract Objectives Urinalysis is one of the most commonly performed tests in the clinical laboratory. However, manual microscopic sediment examination is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and lacks standardization in high-volume laboratories. In this study, the concordance of analyses between manual microscopic examination and two different automatic urine sediment analyzers has been evaluated. Design and methods 209 urine samples were analyzed by the Iris iQ200 ELITE (İris Diagnostics, USA), Dirui FUS-200 (DIRUI Industrial Co., Ch